Of the top twenty craziest bullshit religions, the Church Of Latter Day Saints has got to be in at least the top ten. They wear holy underwear: they baptize the dead; they think that each and every one of them is going to inherit their very own planet and become some sort of deity (of course none of them ever inquire whose deity they’re going to be. That’s rather implied, right?).
One of the more loathsome anachronisms that religion has perpetrated, is the lie of racial inequality. In the Western world, this concept of a ‘holy race’ can be traced directly to the ancient Israelites and their penchant for narcissistic self-loathing. The ‘mark of Cain’ has directly contributed more to racism than any other Occidental ideology to date.
And of course, the top craziest of the crazy cults that old whore Christianity has spewed out into our world, Mormonism, was right up there throwing gasoline on the brushfire of xenophobia:
Mormons can finally say ‘we got it wrong’ over black priest ban
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints announced the publication of a new edition of the scriptures on 1 March. What matters here are the changes made to several headings introducing the text. The changes to Official Declaration 2 – the section lifting the priesthood ban for black men – have implications that are staggering.
Chapter headings are considered to be a study guide rather than sacred, canonised text, so there are no concerns about alterations changing holy writ. But included alongside the scriptures and produced by the leaders of the church, they still carry the unmistakable imprimatur of authority. Many of these changed chapter headings, a side-by-side comparison of which can be seen here, bring the historical context included more in line with current understanding of questions such as where Joseph Smith, founder of the Latter Day Saint movement, lived when he wrote one section or another, or the year certain revelations were received.
What is extraordinary is the admission that in the earliest days of the church, black men were ordained to the priesthood just as white men were. Elijah Abel, a black man, even served in some of the highest governing bodies of the church. Over the years that practice not only ceased, but the history of it was largely forgotten. It wasn’t until 1978 that black men were again allowed to receive the priesthood and black women were allowed to attend the temple. Most members were unaware that there was ever a time when black people were allowed equal participation in the gospel. Trying to explain or defend the racist practice introduced toxic folk doctrines that perpetuated racism into our present day, more than 30 years after the ban was lifted. Even the recent Broadway musical Book of Mormon alludes to this with the statement that “In 1978 God changed his mind about black people”.”
Oh really?
Some famous commentary from a historically famous Mormon, old ‘Brigand’ Young:
“You see some classes of the human family that are black, uncouth, uncomely, disagreeable and low in their habits, wild, and seemingly deprived of nearly all the blessings of the intelligence that is generally bestowed upon mankind….Cain slew his brother. Cain might have been killed, and that would have put a termination to that line of human beings. This was not to be, and the Lord put a mark upon him, which is the flat nose and black skin.” (Journal of Discourses, vol. 7, p. 290).
“In our first settlement in Missouri, it was said by our enemies that we intended to tamper with the slaves, not that we had any idea of the kind, for such a thing never entered our minds. We knew that the children of Ham were to be the “servant of servants,” and no power under heaven could hinder it, so long as the Lord would permit them to welter under the curse and those were known to be our religious views concerning them.” (Journal of Discourses, vol. 2, p. 172).
“Shall I tell you the law of God in regard to the African race? If the white man who belongs to the chosen seed mixes his blood with the seed of Cain, the penalty, under the law of God, is death on the spot. This will always be so.” (Journal of Discourses, vol. 10, p. 110).
There’s plenty more to back that up, here.
The truth of the matter isn’t that their religion is better or worse than others (they’re all bad) – it’s that religious leaders take advantage of their cultic status to pass along their own ignorant opinions, and this just ends up polluting the meme stream.
When religion is laid to its final dusty rest, we will al be the better for it – it perpetuates ignorance and rewards stubborn stupidity.
And just like all the other crazies, these nut jobs make me tres nervous.
Till the next post, then.
I never could understand these guys. Never could understand how Joseph Smith could even be listened to (in these relatively recent times–well, there’s always L. Ron but he was a special case!). I think I saw one of their pyramid-style table drawings once topped off by White=Godliness=Goodness and at the bottom is Black=Satanic=Hate. Something like that. Still can’t grasp it. I was wondering though if anyone has maybe a list of famous current day followers of this religion.
This is the result of too much inbreeding……..
The thing I find sick is that the change was done from a symptomatic approach rather than a causal one: They wanted to clean up their image to avoid the stigma of being called racist, rather than clean up the ideas their racism is founded on.
Thanks, KA, for your…erm…”usual timely due diligence”…?
I’m sure some of you fellow atheists, like myself, have been rather astounded by the oh-so common (and very annoying) appearance on Sites like YouTube…and even on Austin Cline’s atheist Site…of those side panel pictures with quotes like (I’m jokingly paraphrasing?):
“I’m a total fucking inexperienced, childhood brainwashed, irrational nut-bag, who’s never questioned ANYTHING regarding the actual validity of ANY supposed religious scriptures (yada-zada?); AND…
(= the usual mandatory accompanying smiling photo, of course!)
I’m a Moron…I mean…
Mormon!”
[ME; sans recent (non-shitfaced) atheist oriented grin?]:
As I’ve questioningly harped on many times since I became…(thanks, of course, to the Internet)…WAY more aware of “Mormonism”…
just where & when did the fucking second ‘m’ come into usage? After-all, wasn’t it during supposed conversations with the “angel MORONI” whom the known crook/scam artist, Joseph Smith, got the supposed scriptural “lost-found…then lost again (SURPRISE!!!)…gold tablets” & info from…???
By the way…speaking of YouTube (Say what?)…if you haven’t already; check out this rather…erm…’revealing’(?), if partially somewhat dated (and a bit critically & fundie-based biased?), animation RE Mormon doctrinal beliefs (Also, see other video variations at the YouTube page.):
Thanks for this timely column; as the only atheist in my family of origin I have been cast out like so many snakes and you know, I feel less stress because of the tossing. They are cah-razy and I cannot talk with any of them anymore. I am so glad to have you to read.
I just hope these Morons (or their like) don’t have another “revelation” along the lines of “For Jesus to return to us, we must punish/kill all Non-Believers!”
But They’ll just keep sticking it to me “Stalin was an Atheist and look what He did without God” crap.
So, does that mean that if I become a moron (not a typo), I could be a savior of dogs and cats? No, not good enough because I would be doing exactly what I do now.
Yeah, but as a Moron you’d be backed by God, so it’s Official then!
Otherwise Anyone can save dogs and cats, including Satanists.
Just like Anyone can call themselves a Reverend or…a Pope.